W Imię Boga, Miłosiernego, Lito¶ciwego
The Islamic Ruling on Music and Singing
by Abu Bilaal Mustafa al-Kanadi
PREFACE
All praise is due to Almight God, Allah. We praise Him and
seek His help and forgiveness. And we seek refuge in Allah
from the evil of our own selves and from our wicked deeds.
Whosoever has been guided by Allah, there is none to misguide
him. And whoseover has been misguided by Allah, none can guide
him. I bear witness that there is no other god except Allah,
alone, without partner or associate. And I bear witness that
Muhammad is His servant and messenger. May Allah, the Exalted,
bestow His peace and blessings on Prophet Muhammad, upon his
good and pure family, as well as upon all of the noble companions
and upon those who follow them in righteousness until the
Day of Reckoning.
Verily, the most truthful speech is the Book of Allah, and
the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad (Allah's blessings
and peace be upon him); while the worst affairs are novelties,
for every novelty is a blameworthy innovation. Every innovation
(in matters of religion) is misguidance and every misguidance
is in the Fire.
The legality of music and singing in the Islamic shari'ah
(the divinely-revealed law) is an issue which is hotly debated
among individuals and scholars in Islamic societies of our
present day. Arriving at the correct view requires unbiased,
scholarly research of the available literature which must
be supported by authentic, decisive proof.
A considerable amount has been said and written both for
and against this subject, and the proliferation of doubt and
confusion necessitates another more critical, meticulous analysis
and assessment of this whole matter, in order for one to come
to a clear, decisive conclusion which leaves not the least
bit of doubt in the mind of the reader.
In hope of acheiving such a difficult and lofty goal, I have
applied a distinctive method which I trust, by Allah's leave,
will succeed in achieving these treasured aims and objectives.
Firstly, I analysized and assessed the claims made by differing
factions that certain Quraanic verses support or prohibit
the legality of the issue at hand. Secondly, I stringently
researched the area of pertinent hadeeth literature in order
to shed light on the issue as well as to dispel a number of
misconceptions about the authenticity of certain traditions.
Thirdly, I presented a consensus of the Islamic scholars with
special reference to the pious predecessors of the Islamic
ummah; i.e. the noble companions, the taabi'een, the famous
imams and other jurisprudents (fuqahaa). Fourthly, I attempted
to explain the infinte wisdom which underlies the ruling of
prohibition as ordained by the divinely-revealed shari'ah.
Fifthly, I cited examples of exceptions to the general rule
of prohibition, as either defined by the authentic sunnah
or agreed upon by the scholars. Finally, I presented a synopsis
of the shar'iah texts and a conclusion which clarifies the
prohibited aspects of music, singing and their adjuncts.
I pray that Allah grants success in this endeavor, accepting
it as a work done purely for His sake and bestowing upon us
and our brethren in faith, sincerity and guidance to His straight
path.
Abu Bilal Mustafa Al-Kanadi
Ramadaan 1406/May 1986
Makkah Al-Mukarramah
ANALYSIS OF QURAANIC TEXTS AND COMMENTARIES
It is vital that one critically assesses the extent to which
certain verses of the Quraan allegedly stand as proof for
or against the legality of music and singing. Some of those
verses which might be misconstrued to indicate that music,
singing, dancing etc are permissible, are mentioned first.
They are then followed with a sample of verses, which certain
scholars have claimed to be proof of prohibition regarding
this issue.
VERSES CLAIMED TO INDICATE THE LEGALITY OF MUSIC
The following verses regarding the Psalms of Dawood (upon
whom be peace) is case in point.
THE FIRST VERSE:
{And verily,We did favor some of the prophets over others,
and to Dawood We gave the Psalms.}(*1)
How does this verse purport to be proof for those who claim
legality? It is a common misconception of certain Muslims-especially
those having a western background or living in the west-that
Dawood (peace be upon him)composed the Psalms and sang them
to the accompaniment of music.(*2) There are even some commentators
of English translations of the Quraan who fall prey to the
same error. For example, Abdullah Yusuf Ali comments on this
verse saying, "The spiritual gifts with which the Prophets
came, may themselves, take different forms according to the
needs of the world and the times in which they lived, as judged
by the wisdom of God. A striking example here given is the
gift of song and music as given to David...(*3) The fact is
that the Psalms were not composed by Prophet Dawood (upon
whom be Allah's peace and blessings), but rather were revealed
to him(*4) by Allah, the exalted, as is clearly stated in
the Quraan.(*5) Additionally, nowhere in the Quraan or in
the authentic traditions(*6) is there any support for this
accompanying the psalms with musical instruments .
In order to properly understand the true nature of the Psalms
(Az-Zaboor), one must look to some of the dependable Quraanic
commentaries (tafaseer). Ibn Katheer (Allah's mercy be upon
him), explains the meaning of the term Az-Zaboor saying, "Az-Zaboor
is the name of the book revealed by Allah to Dawood (peace
be upon him)."(*7) Al-Aloosi further confirms this saying,
"Az-Zaboor is the name of the book sent down to Dawood (upon
whom be peace); it was revealed to him gradually, by installments."(*8)
As to the nature of these psalms, Al-Qurtubi states, "Az-Zaboor
is the book of Dawood, consisting of one hundred and fifty
chapters; however, it contained no rulings of divine law on
matters of prohibited or allowed things. Rather, it consisted
of words of wisdom and admonishment."(*9) Al-Aaloosi adds
to this description that "the Zaboor also contained divine
praises and glorification of Allah, (exalted be His praise)."(*10)
Prophet Dawood's captivating, melodious voice was exceedingly
beautiful and effective. When he recited the Zaboor, men,
jinn, birds and wild animals gathered around him.(*11)
THE SECOND VERSE:
Some ignorant people claim that the following text regarding
Prophet Ayyoob(Job), whom Allah tested with various trials
and tribulations, permits music and dancing:
{Allah, the Exalted and Mighty, commands His messenger,
Muhammad in the Quraan, "And recall Our servant, Ayyoob, when
he cried unto his Lord, 'Verily, Satan has afflicted me with
distress and suffering.' It was said unto him, 'Strike the
ground with your foot; here is a spring for a cool bath and
water to drink.'}(*12)
In these verses Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, directs
His Prophet, Ayyoob, to strike his foot upon the ground, whereupon
a spring came forth. He bathed in its cool, soothing water
which healed the disease afflicting the outer surface of his
body. He also drank from the spring which removed the illness
that afflicted his innermost body. Thus, after putting His
faithful servant, Ayyoob, to excruciating tests and trials,
Allah Ta'aala judges him to be firm, patient and unwavering
in his faith, saying: {Truly, We found him firm in patience
and constancy; how excellent a slave. Verily, he was ever
turning in repentance (to his Lord).}(*13)
Regarding this verse, Al-Qurtubi mentions in his tafseer
that certain ignorant ascetics and common Sufis have sought
proof for the permissibility of dancing in Allah's saying
to Ayyoob, {Strike the ground with your foot.}(*14)
He relates the reply of some scholars to such baseless claims.
Abul-Faraj Ibnul-Jowzi says, "This is an empty argument. Had
there been a command for the striking of the foot as an act
of joy, there might be some slight excuse for such a view;
however, the fact is that the command for striking the ground
with the foot was in order to get the spring water to flow
from it"(*15) Ibn Aqeel gives a further rebuttal by questioning,
"How is the proof of the legality of dancing deduced from
the simple fact that an afflicted person is ordered as a means
of miraculous healing to strike the earth with his foot in
order to cause water to spring forth?"(*16) He further suggests
that if such reasoning were correct, "It would also be right
to interpret Allah's saying to Moosa, {Strike the stone
with your staff.}(*17) as a proof for the legality of
striking [rhythmically] upon [stuffed] cushions with sticks!(*18)
We seek refuge in Allah from such fraudulent playing with
the Shari'ah."(*19)
Obviously, one could make endless far-fetched analogies between
certain verses of the Quraan and various, false, preconceived
notions which one might hope to substantiate. May Allah protect
us from such evil manipulation of the divinely-revealed law.
It is essential at this point to mention that if it were
established - for the sake of argument - that Dawood (peace
be upon him) did in fact have musical accompaniment to his
psalms; such a thing would not be proof that music, singing
to musical accompaniment, etc. are followed in Islam. This
is substantiated by the agreed upon principle from the science
of usoolul fiqh(*20) which states that the revealed law (shar'un)
of those who came before us(*21) is considered applicable
insofar as such law is not explicitly abrogated by the texts
of the final divine;y-revealed law of Islam as embodied in
the Quraan and the authentic sunnah.(*22) However, as will
be presented later, there is abundant authentic proof from
the Islamic Shari'ah which prohibits music. Therefore, this
prohibition by the Islamic Shari'ah abrogates all previously-revealed
law and nullifies any support it may have made for the legality
of music. With this in mind, it becomes abundantly clear that
the attempts of certain persons to use such previously-mentioned
verses as proof for the permissibility of music are baseless
and untenable .
QURAANIC VERSES ALLEGED TO INDICATE PROHIBITION
OF MUSIC
In his tafseer, Imam Al-Qurtubi mentions that there are three
verses which have been used by the ulaama as proof of the
contempt for and the prohibition of singing.
THE FIRST VERSE:
The first of these verses appears in Soorah An-Najm(*23)
as follows:
Allah, the Blessed and Exalted, addresses the disbelievers
from the tribe of Quraysh, {Do you marvel at this statement,
and laugh and do not weep, while you amuse yourselves [proudly]
in vanities? Rather, prostrate before Allah and worship Him.}
The important phrase is Allah's saying, {Wa antum saamidoon}
("while you amuse yourselves [proudly] in vanities). Due
to the root 'samada' having various interpretations in the
Arabic language, the scholars differ about this phrase's meaning.
As a result, different interpretations are given by the commentators
of the Quraan, such as the companions, taabi'een and later
scholars of tafseer.
Al-Qurtubi refers to the various derived meanings mentioned
by the linguists (*24). Among the meanings understood from
the root' samada' is the raising of one's head up proudly
or in disdain. When conjugated, the noun form 'sumood' means
leisure or idle play, while 'saamid' (the doer of the action)
means one who plays idly with musical instruments or other
objects of play. It is said to the singing girl, "Asmideena!"("Amuse
us with your singing!") However, 'saamid' can also designate
one who lifts his head in pride and haughtiness, as mentioned
in the ancient dictionary, As-Sihah.(*25) A further
meaning derived from the root 'samada' is the notion of standing
motion less or idle. This was mentioned by Al-Mathdawi,(*26)
one of the famous grammarians, but he added that the common,
established meaning in the language points to the idea of
turning away by making fun and amusement. Finally, Al-Mubarrid
mentions the meaning of 'saamidoon' saying, "Saamidoon means
khaamidoon [silent, motionless]."(*27)
At-Tabari mentions in detail the various narrations traced
to the sahaabah and taabi'een.(*28) According to Ibn Abbaas,
the word 'saamidoon' in this verse refers to the mushrikeen's
habit of singing and playing noisily whenever they heard the
Quraan being recited, in order to drown out the reciter's
voice so that others wouldn't hear it.(*29) This meaning is
used by the people of Yemen. Ibn Abbas also indicated a second,
more general meaning for the word 'saamidoon'; namely, that
they were playing and amusing themselves and making light
of the affair. The same opinion was held by some taabi'een
such as Ikrimah and Ad-Dahhaak. A third meaning given by Ibn
Abbaas is that they held their heads up in pride. Other tabi'een
have indicated certain meanings similar to the preceding linguists'
views. Thus, Qataadah reports Al-Hasan as saying that 'samidoon'
is the mushrikeen's being inattentive and negligent. Mujaahid
says it indicates their being in a state of extreme anger
or rage.
Clearly, the term 'saamidoon' has various possible meanings,
e.g that those referred to were singing noisily and amusing
themselves with music and idle play, that they were holding
their heads in pride, or that they were exhibiting extreme
anger and hatred for what they heard of the Quraan and the
message of Islam. Furhermore, it could indicate that they
were indifferent, negligent and rejectionist in their attitude.
All of these meanings are possible, and are not - in essence
- contradictory. Most likely, 'saamidoon' is a comprehensive
description of their different reactions upon hearing the
verses of the Quraan and the new message of tawheed. However,
it must be said that when a Quranic term yields a number of
different possible meanings and we have no clear, authentically-reported
statement from the Prophet defining it in a strict sense,
then such a verse containing the said term cannot be used
as an unequivocal, decisive proof (daleelun qat'ee) of any
particular meaning. Thus, this verse cannot stand alone as
an uncontestable proof of the prohibition of singing, music,
etc. Rather, other evidence, either from the Quraan itself
or from the authentic sunnah, must prove such a position.(*30)
THE SECOND VERSE:
Another verse alleged to be proof of the illegality of music,
singing, etc is mentioned in Soorah Al-Israa as follows:
After Iblees (Satan) refuses to bow before Adam as ordered,
he requests that Allah grant him respite until the Day of
Resurrection, so that he may misguide all but a a few of the
descendants of Adam (peace be upon him). Allah, the Glorious
and Exalted, addresses Satan thus, {And excite any of them
whom you can with your voice. Assault them with your cavalry
and infantry, be a partner with them in their wealth and children,
and make them promoses. But Satan promises them nothing except
deceit.}(*31)
It is related that some of the commentators from the generation
of the taabi'een, such as Mujahid and Dahhaak,(*32) interpreted
Satan's exciting mankind with his voice to mean through the
use of music, song and amusement. Ad-Dahaak said it was the
sound of wind instruments. However, according to Ibn Abbaas,
the voice mentioned in the verse refers to every form of invitation
which calls to disobedience to Allah, the Exalted.(*33) After
mentioning the various interpretations of the commentators,
At-Tabari says, "The most correct of these views expresses
that verily, Allah, the Blessed and Exalted, said to Iblees,
{Excite whosoever of Adam's progeny you can with your voice,}
and He did not specify any particular type of voice. Thus,
every voice which is not an invitation to Allah's worship
and to His obedience is included in the meaning of Satan's
'voice' which is referred to in the Quraanic verse."(*34)
In conclusion, this verse - like the preceding one - is too
general in its meaning, and is not by itself an explicit and
unequivocal proof of the prohibition of music and singing,
except in the case that such singing and music invites or
leads to disobedience to Allah. Therefore, one must look at
other unambiguous texts, which clearly show music, singing,
etc. to be prohibited intrinsically and not due to some extraneous
variable.
THE THIRD VERSE:
The final verse, and the one most often presented as proof
of prohibition, is located in Soorah Luqmaan:(*35)
Allah, the Exalted, says, {And there are among men those
who purchase idle talk in order to mislead others from Allah's
path without knowledge, and who throw ridicule upon it. For
such there will be a humiliating punishment.}
After mentioning the condition of the felicitous (those who
are guided by Allah's Book and who benefit from listening
to it), Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, reveals the condition
of the miserable ones who refuse to benefit from hearing the
word of God. They only devote themselves avidly to idle and
foul talk, empty amusements and all other false works and
deeds whose purposes are to turn others away from Allah's
path and to make it the butt of mockery.
Ibn Jareer At-Tabari, in his Jaamiul Bayaan, mentions
that the interpreters of the Quraan differed as to the meaning
of the term {lahwal hadeeth} (idle talk) which occurs
in the above-quoted verse. Their views regarding its meaning
can be formulated into three basic categories.
The first category defines the term {lahwal hadeeth}:
(a) singing and listening to songs, (b) the purchasing of
professional male or female singers and (c) the purchase of
instruments of amusement; namely, the drum (tabl). The elements
of this category revolve around reference to the blameworthy
usage of instruments of idle amusement, in short, music and
song. This view was held by a number of companions such as
Ibn Masood, Jaabir and Ibn Abbaas. It is related that the
former was questioned regarding the meaning of the verse under
discussion to which he replied, "I swear by the One other
than Whom there is no god that it refers to singing [ghinaa]";
he repeated it three times to emphasize his position.(*36)
It is related that Ibn Abbaas said it referred to "singing
and the like."(*37) Jaabir is reported to view its meaning
to signify singing and listening to songs.(*38) This general
view pointing to censure of music and song was also held by
a great number of taabi'een, such as Ikrimah, Mujaahid, Makhool
and Umar bin Shuayb, to name only a few.(*39)
The second category of interpretation centers around the
idea that {lahwal hadeeth} indicates conversation inviting
to or consisting of shirk (polytheism). This view was the
view of some tafseer scholars from the generation after the
companions, such as Ad-Dahaak and Abdur-Rahmaan bin Zayd bin
Aslam.(*40)
The third category conveys the meaning of all false talk,
actions or deeds, whose nature it is to divert people from
Allah's path and from His worship and remembrance. For example,
Al-Aaloosi relates that Al-Hasan Al-Basri was reported as
saying that {lahwal hadeeth} includes "everything which
distracts one from worship and the remembrance of Allah such
as whiling the night away in idle conversation or entertainment,
jokes, superstitous tales, songs and the likes thereof."(*41)
Al-Aaloosi supports this view, saying that the verse should
be interpreted to include all such blameworthy words and deeds
which divert one from Allah's path.
After having conveyed the previously-mentioned categories
of tafseer, Ibn Jareer relates the commentary of Ibn Zayd
about the verse, {And there are among men those who purchase
idle talk in order to mislead others from Allah's path without
knowledge, and who throw ridicule upon it.} Ibn Zayd said,
"The people referred to [in this verse] are the disbelievers.
Don't you see that it says [in the immediately following verse],
{And when Our revelations are recited to such a person
he turns away in pride as if he hadn't heard them, as if there
was a deafness in his ears.}(*42) The people of Islam
are not as those described here, although some say the verse
refers to Muslims [as well]. The verse refers to the disbelievers
who pitched their voices in a tumultuous clatter in order
to drown out the hearing of the Quraan."(*43)
At-Tabari concludes by offering his own weighted preference
for the general, inclusive meaning as conveyed in this final
category. He states, "The most correct view regarding the
meaning of {lahwal hadeeth} is the one which indicates
every form of conversation(*44) which diverts from Allah's
path - the hearing of which has been prohibited by Allah or
His Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him). This is because
the statement by Allah, the Exalted, is general and inclusive,
and does not exclude certain forms of conversation. Therefore,
His statement remains in its general context unless proof
which specifies it appears; and singing and polytheism [shirk]
are included in this general statement."(*45)
From what has preceded, it is to be understood that a specific
or exclusive meaning such as singing or shirk cannot be proven;
rather, the verse and particularly the phrase {lahwal hadeeth}
should be interpreted as anything which diverts one from Allah's
path. Music, singing, etc. (since they occupy people's attention
and distract them from Allah's worship and remembrance and
invite to His disobedience), no doubt fall under the general
censure, blame and rebuke cast upon those who fall into this
category. However, this verse is not itself an explicit, unequivocal
proof for the prohibition of music, singing, etc. Rather,
its prohibition is conditional and incidental as stated above.
Thus, this issue requires other external proofs which are
both clear and categorical, so as not to leave the least bit
of doubt in the mind of the conscientious, truth-seeking believer.
In order to achieve such a lofty, yet absolutely vital objective,
it is necessary to turn to the second source of the Islamic
shari'ah, the authentic sunnah of Allah's Messenger (upon
whom be blessings and peace).
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HADEETH LITERATURE
A meticulous, critical analysis of the relevant texts from
the hadeeth literature reveals that, contrary to the commonly-held
belief, there are a number of authentic narrations from the
prophetic sunnah which clearly point to the indisputable fact
that music, instruments, singing to accompaniment, etc. are
objects prohibited by the Islamic Shar'iah. The exceptions
to this general rule are specific, limited types of innocent
singing or chanting without any instrumental accompaniment
or to the accompaniment of the simple hand drum (daff) on
certain occasions designated by the sunnah. Their details
require discussion later.
Unfortunately, due to certain modern scholars' blind imitation
(taqleed) of a few earlier scholars, many Muslims entertain
the misconception that all the hadeeths relating to music,
singing, musical instruments, etc. are either weak (da'eef)
or forged (mowdoo'). A critical analysis of the available
hadeeth literature clearly reveals that this is an untenable
position. In order to substantiate this claim and to dispel
such false notions, it is necessary to quote a number of authentic
traditions along with the translation of their meanings.
THE TRADITIONS AND THEIR DEGREE OF AUTHENTICITY
THE NARRATION OF AL-BUKHAARI:
The translation of the hadeeth follows: The Prophet (Allah's
peace and blessings be upon him) said, "There will be [at
some future time] people from my Ummah [community of Muslims]
who will seek to make lawful: fornication, the wearing of
silk,(*46) wine-drinking and the use of musical instruments
[ma'aazif]. Some people will stay at the side of the mountain
and when their shepherd comes in the evening to ask them for
his needs, they will say, 'Return to us tomorrow.' Then Allah
will destroy them during the night by causing the mountain
to fall upon them, while He changes others into apes and swine.
They will remain in such a state until the Day of Resurrection."(*47)
A CRICTICAL DISCUSSION OF ITS ISNAAD:(*48)
Prior to a discussion of the meaning of the part of this
hadeeth relevant to this treatise, it is necessary to refute
certain unfounded criticisms of its authenticity directed
at it by a few scholars of the past and present, struggling
under unfortunate misconceptions.
At the beginning of the isnaad, Imam Al-Bukhaari related,
"Qaala Hishaamu-bnu Ammaar..."("Hishaam bin Ammaar said...")
This statement was misconstrued by Ibn Hazm to indicate that
there is a missing link between Al-Bukaari and the next narrator
(i.e Hishaam),(*49) implying that the hadeeth's isnaad is
disconnected (munqati') and therefore not valid as proof in
the prohibition of music, song, musical instruments, etc.
This type of isnaad, termed mu'allaq, contains a missing link.
However, Al-Bukaari's hadeeth is authentic, because there
exist fully-connected chains for it which fulfill the condition
of authenticity. This was stated by the great critical scholar
of hadeeth, Shaykh Ibnus-Salaah, in his celebrated work, Uloomul
Hadeeeth (his treatise on the science or methodology of
hadeeth criticism and assessment). In his commentary of Saheehul
Bukhaari, entitled Fat-hul Baari, Ibn Hajar mentioned
Ibnus Salaah's meticulous refutation of Ibn Hazm's statement.(*50)
Among the other great critical scholars of hadeeth who mentioned
that the isnaad is soundly connected (mowsool) is Ibn Hajar's
shaykh, Al-Haafidh Al-Iraaqi. He stated that the isnaad is
found connected in Al-Ismaa'eeli's work, entitled Al-Mustakhraj,
which collects together other chains of narrators (or similar
ones) for the same hadeeths mentioned in Al-Bukhaari's collection.
And finally, there is Ibn Hajar's distinctive work, Taghleequt
Ta'leeq, a rare and stupendous masterpiece, which brings
together connected, authentic chains (asaneed) of transmitters
for those traditions which appear in Al-Bukhaari's compilation
in the form of the disconnected (mu'alliq) type of hadeeth,
thereby dispelling accrued misconceptions regarding the claim
of "weak" hadeeths occuring in the text (matn) of Al-Jaamis
As-Saheeh.(*51)
After quoting other complete, authentic chains(*52) for the
tradition under study, along with the sources wherein such
chains of transmitters are mentioned,(*53) Ibn Hajar concludes
by emphasizing (in reference to Al-Bukhaari's narration):
"This is an authentic hadeeth. It has no deficiency or defect,
and there is no point of weakness for any attack to be made
on it. Abu Muhammed Ibn Hazam labeled it as defective by virtue
of his claim that there is a break [intiqaa'] in the chain
between Al-Bukhaari and Sadaqah bin Khaalid and because of
the difference of opinion regarding the name of Abu Maalik(*54)
As you've seen, I have quoted nine fully-connected chains
of transmission (asaneed) whose narrators are thoroughly dependable.
As for the difference regarding the kunyah of the companions,
they are all of impeccable repute. Further more, in Ibn Hibbaan's
narration, the transmitter stated that he heard from both
of them...(*55) I have in my possession yet other chains which
could be presented here, however, I would not like to prolong
this subject further by mentioning them. In what we have stated
there is enough proof for the sensible, thinking person. And
Allah is the grantor of success."(*56)
In short, this particular narration of Al-Bukhaari is authentic
and consequently constitutes a valid and binding text to be
referred to in determining the ruling (hukm) regarding music.
It should be mentioned that certain modern-day writers, who
blindly imitate previous scholars by quoting their views without
applying the critical sciences of hadeeth research, have merely
parroted the position of Ibn Hazm, and due to this, have caused
many unwary persons to go astray regarding this issue. For
example, Yoosuf Al-Qardaawi, in his popular book, entitled
Al-Halaal wal Haraam fil Islam,(*57) says in regard
to the extant hadeths on music: "As for what has been mentioned
by way of prophetic traditions [relating to the subject of
music], all of these have been assessed to have some point
or another of weakness according to the fuqahaa of hadeeth
and its scholars.(*58) The Qaadi Abu Bakr Ibnul-Arabi said,
'There is no authentic hadeeth prohibiting singing.' And Ibn
Hazm said, 'Every hadeeth related [prohibiting music and singing]
is false and forged."(*59)
Unfortunately, the statement that "all" the narrations are
weak according to "scholars of hadeeth" is a gross error on
Al-Qardaawi's part and is not the result of meticulous critical
research. Rather, it is due to an uncritical, blind acceptance
of the words of Ibn Hazm and Ibnul-Arabi. Ibn Hazm was no
doubt a virtuous, sharp-minded scholar; however, in the area
of hadeth assessment and verification (as is the case in many
aspects of his school of Dhaahiri fiqh), he has certain untenable
and unfounded, even some very abnormal views.(*60) The accomplished
hadeeth scholar and student of Ibn Taymiyyah, Al-Haafidh Ibn
Abdul-Haadi, says of Ibn Hazm that "he often errs in his critical
assessment of the degrees of traditions and on the conditions
of their narrators."(*61) In fact, there is unanimous consensus
among the most reputable critical scholars of hadeeth regarding
Ibn Hazm's erroneous assignment of a ruling of d'af (weakness)
to Al-Bukhaari's hadeeth. Regarding the degree of this hadeeth,
the views of Ibnus-Salaah, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani and Al-Haafidh
Al-Iraaqi have already been mentioned. Among the qualified
scholars who also agree with his assessment are the great
scholars, Ibnul-Qayyim and Ibn Taymiyyah. Ibnul-Arabi is similar
to Ibn Hazm in that he is quick to give a ruling of forgery
or weakness on a hadeeth, without the necessary, detailed
analysis and synthesis of all extant chains of narration relating
to the subject. Had he executed such an analysis, undoubtedly
he would have arrived at a sound decision and avoided much
blame and censure.
Having established the authenticity of the aforementioned
narration recorded in Imam Al-Bukaari's compilation, the meaning
of his hadeeth and its stand as an indisputable proof of the
unlawfulness of music may now be discussed.
COMMENTARY ON AL-BUKHAARI'S HADEETH:
The portion of Al-Bukhaari's hadeeth, which is presently
of concern, is that segment whose text states:
"There will be a people of my ummah [nation] who will seek
to make lawful: fornication, the wearing of silk, wine-drinking
and the use of musical instruments..."
The word of consequence here is the Arabic term 'ma'aazif'.
In order to discover what it implies, one must turn to Arabic
dictionaries of hadeeth terms and other scholarly works. According
to Lisaanul Arab,(*62) ma'aazif is the plural of mi'zaf
or 'azf,(*63) and indicates objects or instruments of play
or leisure which are beat upon for their sound. If the singular
form is used (mi'zaf), it specifically means a type of large
wooden drum used mainly by the people of Yemen. The noun 'azf
also stands for the act of playing with ma'aazif, i.e. hand
drums (dufoof)(*64) or other instruments which are struck
upon. Al-Jowhari, the author of the ancient dictionary, As-Sihaah,
asserts that ma'aazif signifies musical instruments, al-'aazif
indicates one who sings, and the 'azf of the wind is its voice.(*65)
In the famous Taajul 'Aroos min Jawaahiril Qaaamoos,
besides quoting the above-mentioned meanings, the commentator
Az-Zabeedi says that ma'aazif are instruments of leisure which
are drummed upon or played, like the lute ('ood), the drum
(tanboor), the small hand drum (daff) or other such musical
objects.(*66) And finally, in the famous dictionary, An-Nihaayah
fee Ghareebil Hadeeth,(*67) Ibnul-Atheer mentions the
meaning of ma'aazif as it is used in various hadeeths. He
comments, "By 'azf is meant playing with ma'aazif, consisting
of dufoof [hand drums] or other instruments which are beat
upon." He also mentions the derived noun form, 'azeef, which
means "sound" or voice", while 'azeeful jinn signifies the
ringing of the jinns' voices. It is said that the people of
the desert imagined the shrill ringing of the winds in the
desert air to be the voice of jinns.(*68)
The commentaries of the scholars of hadeeth also agree on
the above-quoted meaninings for the term maazif mentioned
in Al-Bukhaari's narration. In Ibn Hajar's exhaustive commentary
of Saheehul Bukhaari,(*69) he adds that an earlier
hadeeth scholar, named Ad-Dimyaati, says that the word 'azf
is also used to describe singing (ghinaa).(*70)
Such a detailed analysis of the meaning of the term ma'aazif,
as mentioned in the most authoritative dictionaries of the
Arabic language, is necessary to refute any others' possible
attempts to "explain away" or "interpret" it in a matter suiting
their preconceived notions or opinions. It clearly has been
established that the word ma'aazif - according to correct
Arabic usage - indicates a specific number of things: (a)
musical instruments, (b) the sounds of those musical instruments
(music) and (c) singing to instrumental accompaniment.
ANALYSIS OF THE TEXT AS A PROOF OF PROHIBITION:
An analysis of the hadeeth's wording clearly indicates the
unlawfulness of music. In the text it is said that people
from the Prophet's ummah will "seek to make lawful" that which
is termed ma'aazif. This statement ("seek to make lawful")
is derived from the verb yastahilloona, whose first part,
yasta, is the conjugated addition to the root ahalla. The
conjugated form ista means to seek, try, attempt, desire,
etc., while the root ahalla means to make lawful. Taken together
it means "to seek to make lawful". Obviously, one can only
seek, desire or attempt to make lawful that which is not lawful.
For if something is already lawful, it is nonsensical for
one to seek to establish it. Other things which people will
attempt to make lawful are named along with ma'aazif. These
additional matters are definitely prohibited in Islam - namely,
illegal sexual intercourse, the drinking of wine or liquor
and the wearing of silk (for males). Had ma'aazif(*71) not
been prohibited, they never would have been associated with
other prohibited objects in one and the same context.
In order to dispel the common misconception prevalent among
certain Muslims that "only one hadeeth" in Al-Bukkhaari's
compilation stands as proof of prohibition regarding this
issue, it is necessary to mention a sample of other authentic
hadeeth. The fact that the majority of traditions regarding
music, instruments and singing are weak and rejected (munkar)
does not negate the existence of an appreciable number whose
degree is saheeh (authentic) or hasan (of good, acceptable
quality).
THE NARRATION OF IBN MAAJAH:
There is a narration by Ibn Maajah in Kitaabul Fitan(*72)
in the chapter on punishments. The translation is:
The messenger of Allah said: "A people of my ummah will drink
wine, calling it by other than its real name. Merriment will
be made for them through the playing of musical instruments
and the singing of lady singers. Allah will cleave the earth
under them and turn others into apes and swine."
This is an authentic hadeeth. It was also narrated by Al-Bayhaqi
and Ibn Asaakir with the same wording. The renowned scholar
of hadeeth and fiqh, Ibnul-Qayyim, authenticated it as mentioned
in the famous hadeeth commentary of the 'allaamah, Abut-Teeb
Muhammad Shamsul-Haqq Al-Adheem-Aabaadi.(*73) Furthermore,
it was given a degree of saheeh by muhaddith of our era, Shaykh
Muhammad Naasiruddeen Al-Albaani. He mentioned its detailed,
critical evaluation and assessment in his Silsatul Ahaadeeth
As-Saheehah(*74) and in his Saheehul Jaamis Sagheer.(*75)
It is further mentioned and authenticated in his Ghaayatul
Maraam, Takhreejul Halaali wal Haraam.(*76)
THE NARRATIONS OF AHMAD BIN HANBAL:
There are a number of narrations proving the prohibition
of music and instruments in Ahmad bin Hanbal's Musnad.
Although many of them are weak, two narrations from his compilation,
which have been verified to be authentic, follow.
THE FIRST TEXT:
The translation is:
The Prophet said: "Verily, Allah prohibited wine, gambling
and al-koobah; and every intoxicant is prohibited." Sufyan
said, "I asked the narrator, Ali bin Badheemah, 'What is al-koobah?'
He answered, 'It is the drum.'"
THE SECOND TEXT:
It is translated thus:
Allah's Messenger said, "Verily, Allah has prohibited for
my ummah: wine, gambling, a drink distilled from corn, the
drum and the lute;(*79) while He supplemented me with another
prayer, the witr."(*80)
These narrations have also been related by other compilers,
such as Al-Bayhaqi in his Shu'ubul Eemaan with an authentic
isnaad and At-Tabaraani in Al-Mu'jam Al-Kabeer with
a jayyid (good) isnaad. The detailed proof of their verified
authenticity are mentioned in Al-Albaani's Saheehul Jaami'is
Sagheer.(*81) It is further authenticated in his Mishkaatul
Masaabeeh(*82) and in his work, Al-Ahadeeth As-Saheehah.(*83)
THE NARRATION OF AL-HAAKIM AND OTHERS:
It is reported by Al-Haakim in his Mustadrak(*84)
that the Prophet (upon whom be peace and blessings) took the
hand of the companion, AbdurRahmaan bin 'Owf, and they proceeded
to visit the Prophet's ailing son, Ibraheem. They found the
infant in the throes of death, so the Prophet took him to
his breast and held him until his spirit left him. Then he
put the child down and wept, whereupon Abdur-Rahmaan asked
in astonishment, "You are weeping, Oh Messenger of Allah,
while you prohibit crying!?" The following is the Prophet's
reply:
"Verily, I did not prohibit weeping [per se] but rather,
I forbade two voices [sowtayn] which are imbecilic [ahmaq]
and sinfully shameless [faajir]: one, a voice [singing] to
the accompaniment of musical amusement [lahw] and Satan's
[wind] instruments; the other, a voice [wailing] due to some
calamity, accompanied by striking of the face and tearing
of garments. But this [weeping of mine] stems from compassion,
and whosoever does not show compassion will not receive it."
This hadeeth's degree is hasan,(*85) and it has been strengthened
by another narration related by Abu Bakr Ash-Shaafi'ee in
his work, Ar-Rubaa'eeyat.(*86) Its abbreviated text
follows.
THE NARRATION OF ABU BAKR ASH-SHAAFI'EE:
Anas bin Maalik related from the Prophet (may Allah bless
him and grant him peace) that "two cursed sounds are that
of the [wind] instrument [mizmaar](*87) played on the occasion
of joy and grace, and woeful wailing upon the occurrence of
adversity."(*88)
A similar text with slightly different wording is related
by Al-Bazzaar in his collection(*89) of hadeeths. Al-Haafidh
Nooruddeen Al-Haythami mentioned it in his Majma' Az-Zawaaid(*90)
and indicated that the narrators of this isnaad are all dependable.
Thus, these last three narrations prove the illegality of
music and singing to musical accompanient, especially wind
instruments (mazaameer), which are referred to as "flutes
of Satan" in the tradition related by Al-Haakim.
The traditions quoted are not the only available authentic
hadeeths which establish prohibition. There are others(*91),
however the scope of this treatise does not allow a more detailed
exposition. The sample mentioned is sufficient proof, for
{verily, therein is a reminder for any who has a heart
or who gives ear and earnestly witnesses [the truth].}(*92)
Return
to Table of Contents
Footnotes
(*1)Soorah Al-Israa, 17:55.
(*2)The common misconception is that he sang
to the accompanient of harp. The origin of this is in Judeo-Christian
sources which have suffered the effects of alteration and
distortion; therefore, they cannot be depended upon.
(*3)The Holy Quran: text,translation
and commentary, vol. 1, p.709, footnote no. 2241.
(*4)It must be noted that the "psalms" which
are presently extant in the Old testament versions are erroneuosly
attributed to Dawood and are not the original Psalms (Az-Zaboor)
revealed to him by Allah. The reason for this is the extensive
alteration and interpolation of later writers.
(*5)For example, see Soorah Bani Israeel,
17:55 and Soorah An-Nisaa, 4:163.
(*6)Traditions are authentic textual material
containing clear and explicit sayings of the Prophet. His
sayings in this matter only refer to the beautiful, melodious
quality of Dawood's voice in reciting from the Book of Psalms.
It is true that a number of narrations (aathaar mowqoofah)
reported on the authority of some of the taabi'een (the generation
after the companions) refer to the wonderful qualities of
Dawood's voice in an exxagerated manner, and in some of these
a mention of musical instruments is found. However, such narrations
do not stand as valid proof in this issue because they consist
of views and/or reports of the type known as israaaeeliyaat
(reports gleaned from hearsay or the traditions of the People
of Book). The criterion in such matters is to be based upon
a reference to Allah's Book and the authentic sunnah. For
a sample of such narrations, see Ibn Katheer's volumnious
historic compendium, AlBidaayah wan Nihaayah, vol.2,
pp. 10-11.
(*7)See Tafseerul Quraanil Adheem,
vol.2, p. 422.
(*8)Refer to the tafseer (commentary) entitled
Roohul Ma'aani, vol. 6, p. 17.
(*9)See Qurtubi's Al-Jaami'li Ahkaamil
Quraan, vol. 6, pp. 16-17.
(*10)Tafseer Roohul Ma'aani, vol 6,
p. 17.
(*11)For details, see Qurtubi's Al-Jaami'li
Ahkaamil Quraan, vol 6, p. 17; Ibn Katheer's Al-Bidaayah
wan Nihaayah, vol. 2, pp.10-11 and An-Najjaar's Qassasul
Anbiyya, pp. 310-311.
(*12)Soorah Saad, 38:41-42.
(*13)Soorah Saad, 38:44.
(*14)The type of dancing most probably meant
is that of the Sufi dervishes and others; for they considered
their esctatic twirling to the accompaniment of certain ritual
formulas (adhkaar) and musical instruments a form of worship
(ibaadah) which brings one closer to Allah. Of course, such
things are none other than bid'ah (blameworthy innovations
and misguidance in deen).
(*15)See Qurtubi's Al-Jaami'li Ahkaamil
Quraan, vol. 15, p. 215.
(*16)Ibid.
(*17)Soorah Al-Araaf, 7:160.
(*18)The beating of the typically hard, stuffed
cushions of the Arabic "majlis" decor, produces a hollow sound
similar to the bass drum. This was a common musical accompanient
for singers in Iraq during the early historical eras (circa
1st-2nd century of the Hijrah) See pp. 106-107 of Ibn Hajar
Al-Haythami's Kaffur Ra'aa.
(*19)See Qurtubi's Al-Jaami'li Ahkaamil
Quraan, vol. 15, p. 215.
*20)The codified science containing principles
and methods for arriving at a jurisprudential ruling directly
from the texts of the Quraan and sunnah, or by a referral
to the general principles embodied in such texts or applied
to to them.
*21)The law of those who received a divinely-revealed
scripture before us, who are designated as the People of the
Book (Ahlul Kitaab) - the Jews and Christians.
(*22)For details outlining the various scholars'
views regarding the application or abrogation of previously-revealed
law, see Zakaria Bardeesi's Usool Fiqh, p. 243-247.
(*23)53:59-62.
(*24)For details, see pp. 123-124 of vol.17
of his tafseer.
(*25)See Al-Jowhari's As-Sihaah, vol.
2, p. 489.
*26)Al-Jaami'li Ahkaamil Quraan, vol.
17, p. 123.
(*27)Ibid.
(*28)See Jaami'ul Bayaan'an Taweeli Aayil
Quraan, vol. 27, pp. 82-84.
(*29)See also Qurtubi's tafseer, vol. 17,
p. 123.
(*30)It is interesting to note that other
major commentaries of "ahkaamul Quraan" (jurisprudential rulings
derived from the Quraanic texts) do not even mention this
verse as proof for the prohibition of music,etc. For example,
see the works of Al-Jassaas, Ibnul-Arabi and Ilkeeya Al-Harraasi.
(*31)Soorah Al-Israa, 17:64.
(*32)See Qurtubi's tafseer, vol. 10, p. 289;
Ibn Katheer's Tafseerul Quraanil Adheem, vol. 5, p.
91 and At-Tabari's tafseer, vol. 15, p. 118.
(*33)As reported in the narration of At-Tabari
traced to Ibn Abbaas and Qatadah. See his tafseer, vol. 15,
p. 118 for details.
(*34)See At-Tabari's tafseer, vol. 15, p.
118, for details.
(*35)31:6.
(*36)Related by Al-Bayhaqi, Ubnul-Munhdir
and Al-Haakim in his Mustadrak, where he authenticated
it; and it was confirmed by Adh-Dhahabi.
(*37)See At-Tabari's Jaami'ul Bayaan,
vol. 21, p. 61 for the various narrations related to Ibn Abbaas.
(*38)Ibid., vol. 21, p. 62.
(*39)For details, see the tafseer of Ibn
Katheer, vol. 6, p. 334; Al-Qurtubi's Al-Jaami', vol.
14, pp. 51-53 and As-Suyooti's Ad-Durr Al-Manthoor,
vol. 5, pp. 158-160.
(*40)See the commentaries of Ibn Katheer,
vol. 6, p. 334 and At-Tabari, vol. 21, p. 63.
(*41)Roohul Ma'aani, vol. 21, p. 67.
(*42)Soorah Luqmaan, 31:7.
(*43)Related by At-Tabari in his tafseer,
vol. 21, p. 63. The reference is to Soorah Fussilat, 41:26,
whose meaning may be rendered, {Those who disbelieve say,
"Don't listen to this Quraan. Drown out the hearing of it,so
that perchance you may overcome."} There are other interpretations
of it, but Ibn Zayd's, as mentioned above, is the most obvious.
See Al-Qurtubi's tafseer, vol. 15, p. 356, for details.
(*44)That is, every form of communication.
*45)Quoted from p. 63, vol. 21, of his Jaami'ul
Bayaan'an Taweeli Aayil Quraan.
(*46)The wearing of silk is lawful for females
but has been forbidden for men.
(*47)See Fathul Baari, vol. 10, p.
51.
(*48)Isnaad or sanad is the chain of narrators
of prophetic traditions. In this case, it's from Imaam Al-Bukhaari
traced back to the Prophet. The narrator's reliabilty in reporting,
as well as other considerations connected with the science
of verification and assessment of the degree of prophetic
traditions, fall under these terms.
(*49)According to Ibn Hajar's statement in
Fathul Baari, vol. 10, p. 52, Ibn Hazm claimed that
there is a break between Al-Bukhaari and the narrator, Sadaqah
bin Khaalid. Whatever the case, both claims will be shown
to be unfounded.
(*50)For details, refer to vol. 10, p. 52
of the Salafi edition, Cairo.
(*51)This is the short title of Al-Bukaari's
collection, and it means, "The Authentic Compilation." It
is most deserving of this title as it is the most authentic
book after the Quraan.
(*52)See Fathul Baari, vol. 5, pp.
17-22, for details.
(*53)Such as Al-Bukaari's history, At-Taareekh
Al-Kabeer, Ibn Hibbaan's Mawaarid Adh-Dhamaan and
At-Tabaraani's Al-Mu'jam Al-Kabeer.
(*54)i.e whether the companion's name (rather
his kunyah, signifying the appellation, "father of so and
so") was Abu Maalik or Abu 'Aamir.
(*55)That is from both of the companions,
Abu Maalik and Abu 'Aamir. Thus, the question regarding the
diference of the name is no longer an issue.
(*56)Taghleequt Ta'leeq, vol. 5, p.
22.
(*57)This book has been translated into English
by various publishers under the title "The Lawful and the
Prohibited in Islam (Al-Hilal Wal Haram Fil Islam)" by Yusuf
Al-Qaradwi.
(*58)The terminology "fuqahaa of hadeeth"
used by Al-Qardaawi appears to reveal his unfamiliarity with
proper designation of the various types of scholars of Islam
according to their particular branch of Islamic science. Fuqahaa
is a term applied to jusisprudents who study the legal issues
derived from the shari'ah and who arrive at rulings in regard
to them. Nowhere, to my knowledge, has the term fuqahaaul
hadeeth been used in hadeeth criticism. The specialists in
the area of criticism, verification and assesment of hadeeth
literature are termed ashaabul hadeeth (those who relate and
apply the hadeeth) or nuqqaadul hadeeth (critical assessors
of hadeeth) or merely al-muhaddithoon (narrators of hadeeth).
It appears that Al-Qardaawi depends on the views of "general
"scholars, the likes of Al-Ghazaali, Ibnul-Arabi and Ibn Hazm
rather than on the qualified specialists in the noble hadeeth
sciences such as Al-Bukhaari, Muslim, Ahmad, Ibn Ma'een, Abu
Dawood, Abu Zura'h, Ibn Abi Haatim, Ibnus-Salaah, Al-Iraaqi,
Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Hajar. These and their likes are authorities.
But Al-Qardaawi has not quoted these or any of their calibre,
even though there is a conensus among such qualified authorities
that authentic hadeeths prohibiting music and its variants
do exist, as shall be seen futher on in this paper.
(*59)See p.293 of his Al-Halaal wal Haraam
fil Islam. Such bold, all-encompassing statements (if
correctly attributed to Ibn Hazm and Ibnul-Arabi) are unfortunate
examples of overstepping the boundaries of the scholars' domain.
Not even the most accomplished specialists in the field of
hadeeth criticism would dare to make such blank statements
such as, "Every hadeeth relating to prohibition of music is
false." or "There is no authentic hadeeth prohibiting music,"
etc. because they dont know every hadeeth which exists nor
the degree of every hadeeth which exists!! Had these scholars
confined their views somewhat by saying something like, "As
far as I know, there are no authentic hadeeths..."etc. that
would have been closer to the truth, would have protected
their honor and would not have left them open to blame and
censure. But as it is said, "Every prize courser is prone
to a fall", all are prone to error except the true, chosen
Messengers of Allah (may He exalt them and grant them peace).
(*60)This was due to his stubborn insistence
on aplying only the meaning of the shari'ah texts (i.e. the
literal wording of the Quraan and traditions). This attitude
often led him to have peculiar, even ridiculous views regarding
certain jurisprudential issues. See his work, Al-Muhalla
for details.
(*61)Page 401 of his biographical work, Mukhtasar
Tabaqaati Ulamaail Hadeeth.
(*62)The monumental Arabic dictionary, vol.
9, pp. 244-245.
(*63)In this form ('azf), it is an exception
to the general principle of derivation by analogy. See Lisaanul
Arab, vol. 9, p. 244.
(*64)In this form dufoof is plural of daff
or duff, a small hand drum which is like the tambourine except
that it doesnt have the steel objects which rattle. It consists
of a narrow wooden rim. Around one side of it, a thin animal
hide is bound tightly. Sound is evinced by tapping it with
the fingertips or palm of the hand.
(*65)As-Sihaah, vol. 4, p. 1402.
(*66)Taajul 'Aroos min Jawaahirul Qaamoos,
vol. 6, p. 197.
(*67)A dictionary in which terms of the prophetic
traditions appear.
(*68)See vol. 3, p. 230 of An-Nihaayah.
(*69)i.e. Fat-hul Baari, vol.10, p.
55.
(*70)When singing has musical accompanient
it takes on the description of 'azf or mi'zaf, i.e. musical
entertainment.
(*71)Music, instruments and singing to musical
accompaniment.
(*72)See vol. 2, p. 3 85 of the edition edited
by Muhammad Mustafa Al-Adhami.
(*73)See 'Ownul Ma'bood, vol. 13,
p. 271.
(*74)Vol. 1, hadeeth no. 90, pp. 136-139.
(*75)Vol. 5-6, p. 105, hadeeth no. 5530.
(*76)Page 228, hadeeth no. 402.
(*77)See Ahmad's Musnad, vol. 1, pp.
289 and 350, vol. 2, pp. 158 and 171-172.
(*78)See Ahmad's Musnad, vol. 2, pp.
165 and 167.
(*79)The Arabian guitar, termed qinneen in
the text of the hadeeth.
(*80)Witr refers to a voluntary prayer performed
during the night after 'Eeshaa (the night prayer). It consists
of an odd number of units (raka'aat) from one to nine.
(*81)Vol. 1-2, p. 106, hadeeth no. 1743 and
1744.
(*82)Vol. 2, p. 1276, hadeeth no. 4503.
(*83)Vol. 4, pp. 283-285, hadeeth no. 1708
and p. 422, hadeeth no. 1806.
(*84)Entitled Al-Mustadrak 'alas Saheehayn;
the hadeeth appears on p. 40 of vol. 4.
(*85)For the details regarding the critical
analysis and evaluation of this and related asaaneed, see
Al-Albaani's Silsilatul Ahadeeth As-Saheehah, vol.
1, hadeeth no. 428 and Al-Bagawi's Sharhus Sunnah,
vol. 5, p. 431.
(*86)Manuscript no. 2/22/1, as related by
the scholars of hadeeth, Naasiruddeen Al-Albaani in his Al-Ahaadeeth
As-Saheehah, vol. 1, p. 170 of the 5th section.
(*87)A type of flute.
(*88)Its isnaad is authentic.
(*89)Al-Musnad.
(*90)Vol. 3, page 13.
(*91)For other authentic traditions which
will establish the ruling of prohibition, see the valuable
treatise, entitled Ahadeeth Dhammil Ghinaa wal Maazif fil
Meezan, pp. 35, 47, 50 and 53 (Kuwait, Maktabah Daarul
Aqsaa, 1986).
(*92)Soorah Qaaf, 50:37.
|